Disgusting UVM Fraternity Questionnaire Sparks Outrage

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

Today finds me crawling out of blog hibernation to point ya’ll to the latest installment of “College Boys Just Want to Have Fun…By Demeaning Women and Making Jokes About Rape.” Today’s episode takes place at the University of Vermont, where a puzzling and revolting survey was recently distributed to the brothers of Sigma Phi Epsilon. We were sent a copy of the questionnaire, which mostly consists of benign questions like name, birthday, major, amount of time with SigEp and favorite SigEp memories, hobbies, future goals, etc. It’s actually kind of nerdy and cute, until you get to the final three “personal questions.”

1. Where in public would I want to have sex?

2. Who’s my favorite artist?

3. If I could rape someone, who would it be?

We come across a lot of gross stuff at SAFER, but the contrast here makes this particularly jarring and offensive. It’s not the usual litany of purposefully offensive garbage; it’s a seemingly legit, “normal” survey with this one horrifying nuggets thrown in at the end. The normalization of the question—the nonchalance—is so…disturbing.

As often happens with these kind of “frat shenanigans,” the survey made it into the hands of other folks on campus, who were understandably upset and are taking action. This petition was started last night by “Feminists from UVM” and is already up to 375 signatures. This is what they have to say:

This egregious expression of rape culture is only the most recent example of systemic sexism at UVM. The past year alone has witnessed rape, multiple sexual assaults, and anti-abortion chalking in public spaces. While the university administration has laid off long-time Women’s and Gender Studies faculty and supported sexist institutions like Sigma Phi Epsilon, it has refused to take concerted action to combat sexism and rape culture. We demand that instead of diverting resources into vast salaries for its administrators, UVM should launch an aggressive campaign against sexism and rape culture, and it should expand institutions such as Women’s and Gender Studies and the Women’s Center at UVM. Furthermore, UVM must immediately disband Sigma Phi Epsilon. An institution that discusses who it wants to rape has no place at UVM or in the Burlington community.

Sign the UVM petition and look for updates over at FedUp Vermont, a local grassroots feminist organization. The story hasn’t hit the news yet (campus or otherwise) so there is no word on whether the school will take any action or if the men of Sigma Phi Epsilon have anything to say for themselves, but we’ll let you know if they do. Something tells me this was supposed to “funny.” Ha. Ha. Ha.

Cross-posted from Change Happens

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | Leave a comment

There’s no crying in intramural basketball, but there is gender discrimination

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
When I was a kid, the first person who told me I can play basketball just as good as the boys was my dad. He, along with my mother and my brother, told me never to apologize for being the fastest girl on the basketball court or on the track. For the most part, I grew up with positive gender consciousness, and participating in sports, along with family support, made that possible.

At thirty-years-old, I continue to pride myself in the gender work that I do in academia and in the community. I teach two introductory women’s studies courses; one as an assistant instructor at Barnard, and the other at an urban after-school community center. I have a master’s degree in Women’s Studies. I’ve written about gender inequality countless times before. I’ve held my own in discussions about gender discrimination at conferences, dinner tables, and Twitter streams. I do this work everyday. I don’t expect accolades for what I do or for who I am. What I do expect, however, is that after a long day of studying, writing, teaching, and talking about gender discrimination, I can go to a community gym and play ball with guys without my gender being an issue.

So why, on Monday night, was I crying because some skinny ‘white’ guy with a clipboard questioned my ability to play basketball?

I’ve always been that tough girl who stayed on the court after being told “your attitude problem is unbecoming for a girl” or told to “leave that gender equality shit off the court.” I usually respond by trash talking or by scoring multiple jumpers on dudes with sexist commentary. I’ve laughed it off. I’ve also gotten into my share of verbal fights with guys who have disrespected me on the court simply because I have a vagina and wear a sports bra.

Upon approaching the entrance of an NYC public school that hosts a local intramural basketball league, I did not expect that I would be interrogated about why I’m there and patronized because I showed up.

“I’m here to play.” I said.

Read More »

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Body Positive

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

*Editor’s note: May be NSFW

Our first assignment for the Women Filmmakers class I’m taking at Hampshire College was to create a short slideshow about an autobiographical event that shaped how we construct ourselves with specific attention to gender.

My friend and classmate, Dot, produced a wonderful piece about body positivity.  Dot’s piece about body size and normalized images of desire is an honest, frank and candid narrative of the need for positive acceptance of all body sizes.  I could go on about how wonderful this short piece is but her work can and does speak for itself.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Don’t Tell Women They’re Responsible for Rape and Then Wonder Why They Call It “Unwanted Sex”

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about sexual assault statistics, and so has Sandy Hingston—she recently wrote an article in Philadelphia Magazine that is a lengthy attack on Title IX protection for campus assault survivors, explored through the lens of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management (NCHERM). I’d have to write a novella if I wanted to respond to all of it, so for the moment let’s focus on Hingston’s discussion of stats:

What’s interesting about the 2007 Justice Department report is that its researchers didn’t ask the 5,446 female students who took their online survey if they’d been sexually assaulted. They decided for the young women, who despite their on-campus training and support were deemed too ignorant to know.

Specifically, the survey asked whether students had experienced unwanted sexual contact, defined as forced kissing, grabbing, fondling, touching of private parts, and/or oral, anal or vaginal penetration via finger, mouth, tongue, penis or object. If students checked YES, as 1,073—one in five—did, that was deemed a sexual assault. Of those students, 682 were classified as having undergone attempted sexual assault, and another 782 completed sexual assault, with 651 of the latter saying they were passed out, drugged, drunk, incapacitated or asleep at the time.

I’m baffled by Hingston’s outrage at the idea that when a student says they have been forcefully kissed, grabbed, fondled, touched, or penetrated against their will (as “unwanted” behavior indicates) a researcher would label the incident as a sexual assault. Is that NOT the definition of a sexual assault? Hingston frames this as paternalistic and seems to think it robs the participants of agency by not letting them identify their own experiences. While I am a firm believer in letting someone label their own experiences for crafting their own narratives and dealing with experiences, that wasn’t the point of this research. The question isn’t “how many young women say they have been sexually assaulted?” The question is “how many young women have experienced sexual assault, broadly defined?” Read More »

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , | 1 Comment

Washington State University fined over 82K for failure to report rapes

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This

The Department of Education announced this weekend that it will be fining Washington State University $82,500 for failing to address two campus sexual assaults in 2007, as well as due to their lack of campus safety policies:

The university’s three violations of the main federal law on campus-crime reporting, the Clery Act, endangered Washington State students and employees who rely on campus-crime statistics and statements, a federal education official wrote in a letter to the college’s president, Elson S. Floyd.

[...] In one case at Washington State, the letter said, a woman told a campus police official that she had been raped by her husband’s friend. The incident was classified as a “domestics dispute” instead of a forcible sex offense, a mistake that the university later acknowledged, the letter said.

In a second incident, an employee reported a dormitory rape to the campus police that was omitted from campus reports because a records manager decided the case was unfounded. Under the Clery Act, only a law-enforcement official should make such a determination, the letter said.

Washington State also failed to make public certain policies, such as how it prepared crime statistics or imposed sanctions for sex offenses. The college has since corrected its policies, but the 2007 violations remained, the letter said.

While this is just one school (not to mention a monetary fine isn’t exactly a perfect vision of justice), this is still a really important step. It’s part of a larger decision that was made by the Department of Education to review dozens of colleges to ensure they are complying with the Clery Act, which came after a ton of recent reports on the sexual assault epidemic on college campuses — and more importantly, the subsequent lack of action taken by schools to address them.

There’s a reason why 95% of sexual assaults on campus aren’t reported. Let’s hope schools continue to be held accountable, and start taking the idea of campus safety policies seriously.

Share on TwitterShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg This
Tagged , , , | 1 Comment
  • Subscribe

  • Subscribe

  • Meet Us

200 queries. 1.035 seconds